On a more purely philosophical note, PhysOrg posted an interesting new look into the theory of causation. How do we distinguish between prediction and causation? For instance, does a loud sound cause a frog to jump, or does the frog jump because it anticipates harm from whatever caused the sound? The article got into the weeds about “transfer entropy” and “information flow” and other concepts that Shawn Pethel at the Redstone Arsenal in Alabama is trying to work out in his model, but the headline points out the interesting idea that “Information theory may hold the key” to solving this long-standing philosophical debate. The last entry points out that science is inevitably tied to philosophy just as it is tied to ethics. Clearly, though, Pethel cannot hope to arrive at the “truth about nature” without having a personal commitment to integrity. Can you imagine science without integrity? Even if it is not always achieved, it’s like trying to imagine an airplane without air, a fish without water, or a game without rules. If there’s even “honor among thieves,” it’s clear that no field of human endeavor is productive without some measure of integrity. Science should rise among those endeavors with the highest standards.(Visited 12 times, 1 visits today)FacebookTwitterPinterestSave分享0 Naive reporters and textbook writers sometimes portray science as some kind of neutral, bias-free activity in which the “truth” about nature emerges on its own, as long as the scientist in the lily-white lab coat follows some kind of “scientific method.” Philosophers, theologians, ethicists and scientists with a background in any of these fields know better. One has to believe that truth about nature exists in order to seek for it. And one has to seek for it honestly. Many more examples of science’s ties to ethics or “moral philosophy” can be found, as a few recent articles show. Scientific integrity: What is integrity, if not an ethical term describing human character seeking the ideals of honesty and openness? In a letter to Nature last week (Nature 477, 22 September 2011, p. 407, doi:10.1038/477407d), Alfred P. Zarb advised fellow scientists to “Make integrity key to recruitment” in an effort to combat scientific misconduct. “Far from being a vague ideal, the complex and sensitive issue of maintaining integrity in science is a critical imperative,” he said. “In my view, it would help to demand and monitor integrity in scientists and managers from the outset” – when hiring. “Most researchers know from their training that honesty is fundamental to scientific integrity,” he continued, “But some managers and agency officials can find themselves in difficult situations” that tempt them to cheat or compromise. “The only way to achieve scientific integrity across the board is to ensure that personal and professional values (as well as knowledge and skills) are primary criteria for the employment of both scientists and managers.” For his idealism he got some nasty digs by peers. One said, “This is a recipe for the establishment of a scientific Gestapo”; another, “Just forget it – not possible in current scenario.” Even so, the critics were not denying the need for integrity, just Zarb’s method for achieving it. Damage of misconduct: The Hwang scandal of 2006 left South Korea’s stem cell research in tatters. PhysOrg reported that “President Lee Myung-Bak promised Monday to spend some $89 million restoring South Korea’s reputation as a leader in stem cell research, five years after a scandal tarnished its reputation.” Though the short article did not mention it, one can only hope that part of the funding will go to training research scientists in professional ethics, lest another Hwang is hwaiting in the hwings. Universal values: What are the universal values of science? PhysOrg reported on a meeting of the General Assembly of the International Council for Science (ICSU) to delineate them. While scientists generally love to advocate the free practice of science, this body focused on the “need for scientists to pay equal attention to their responsibilities.” Freedom and responsibility must remain in balance, the council emphasized. The article includes a statement by the ICSU explaining their position. On the freedom side, the board “promotes equitable opportunities for access to science and its benefits, and opposes discrimination based on such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political or other opinion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or age.” The flip side is that science “requires responsibility at all levels to carry out and communicate scientific work with integrity, respect, fairness, trustworthiness, and transparency, recognising its benefits and possible harms.” Bengt Gustafsson, chair of the ICSU, spoke of unchanging values even “As our world evolves,” namely, “there are certain principles and responsibilities that are fundamental to ‘good science’.” These include “honesty in all aspects of research, accountability in the conduct of scientific research, professional courtesy and fairness in working with others, and good stewardship of research on behalf of others.” The implication is that “national, and even disciplinary, differences in the way research is actually carried out” might evolve, these principles must remain steadfast. Protestant work ethic: PhysOrg posted an unusual article about a study performed at the University of Warwick that claims the Protestant work ethic was responsible for the economic and social progress of northern European countries over their southern counterparts. Dr. Sascha Becker looked at 450 counties in the 19th century Prussia. “Religiosity was also more pervasive at this time,” Becker said. “It seems religion was the main driver behind education differences, Protestants were more encouraged to go to school and read the bible [sic], and this higher level of education translated into higher incomes than their Catholic neighbours.” More Protestants went to the university, and Protestant counties granted more individual liberty to citizens, including women, who were educated along with the men. Becker traced these advantages to “16th Century Reformers [who] pushed to make sure there were church schools operating in all parishes.” Needless to say, a higher percentage of university graduates would also translate into a higher number of scientists (known as natural philosophers until 1833).
Essential Reading! Get my 2nd book: The Lost Art of Closing “In The Lost Art of Closing, Anthony proves that the final commitment can actually be one of the easiest parts of the sales process—if you’ve set it up properly with other commitments that have to happen long before the close. The key is to lead customers through a series of necessary steps designed to prevent a purchase stall.” Buy Now No one wants a PowerPoint presentation. No one wants to watch or listen to you speak to 100 slides in your slide deck. No one wants to sit passively while you treat them to an interminable monologue.But that doesn’t mean the PowerPoint presentations aren’t valuable. On the contrary they’re extraordinarily valuable in helping you give your clients what they really want.Your clients want to understand why they should change, how they should change, and why they should choose you to help them change. Your deck should speak to the “why” of change.Your clients also want to understand what their needs really are and how they best obtain better outcomes and they’re getting now. Your presentation should speak to understanding needs.Your clients and prospects want to understand what options are available to them in achieving those better outcomes. They want to know what the trade-offs are. There are always choices and trade-offs, and you create value in helping explain those trade-offs.Your clients want to know what the risks are. They want to know how to deal with those risks. They want to know how to avoid anything that might cause them more problems and more pain than they have now. Your presentation can mitigate risk.Your clients want to know how you would approach their project and why you would make the choices you make in helping them. They want to understand your values, your ideas, and what it might be like to work with you. This is what the outcomes that your PowerPoint should support.I once walked into a clients office and he told me not to open my laptop because he didn’t want to presentation. He had 18 questions he wanted answered. The truth is that my PowerPoint would have provided nice visuals to accompany my answers. But he was making his determination as to whether or not to give me the business based on my looking him in the eyes and answering his questions.It’s important to remember the real purpose of your PowerPoint presentation isn’t to provide a PowerPoint presentation.QuestionsWhat is the real purpose of your PowerPoint presentation?Are you delivering to meet those needs?What needs to change?
Pakistani troops violated ceasefire along the Line of Control (LoC) in Uri sector in north Kashmir’s Baramulla district, but there was no loss of life, police said on Sunday.The ceasefire violation took place near LoC at Manga Kamalkote in Uri last night, a police official said.He said the shelling by Pakistani forces damaged a cow-shed and a house, both belonging to local.However, no loss of life was reported, he added.
Two days after the followers of the Sirsa-based Dera Sacha Sauda went on the rampage and clashed with security forces in Panchkula, the epicentre of Friday’s violence, a sense of fear is still palpable among the local people in this otherwise peaceful city, which is now limping back to normality.“As I peeped through the window and saw the agitated mob rushing past on the street, the memories of Partition were rekindled … I told my wife, who was sitting beside me, to stay calm, but yet the fear was evident in her eyes,” Balraj Katiyal, a nonagenarian residing in Sector 4 of Panchkula, told The Hindu. Mr. Balraj’s son Dalip said: “The scene was scary, they [Dera supporters] started throwing stones and torching vehicles soon after the verdict in the rape case was announced,” he said, adding that the government should have taken note of the huge build-up of Dera followers.“Once the security forces used tear gas, the followers started running for shelter. A few scaled the wall of my house and tried to barge in. We were afraid they would harm us,” said Mr. Dalip, a retired bank employee.“Even before the verdict, the way the number of Dera supporters was swelling in the city was creating a sense of fear among us. While the situation is calm now, the past three or four days were frightening,” he said.Rakesh Agarwal of Panchkula said the failure of the State government to judge the situation had put the life of city residents at risk.Lax action“Our lives were at stake and it was all due to the government’s laxity. My maid told me that Dera followers had started gathering in nearby villages at their relatives and friends’ places. The government ignored the early signs and ultimately it was the local people who suffered,” he said. “For the past five days, my family and I have been cooped up inside the house due to the panic across the city. The day the Dera supporters created mayhem, the city’s sky was covered in smoke. The visuals I witnessed from my roof were chilling,” he said.Seema Bhardwaj, a resident of Sector 2 of the city, said she heard loud howling voices from the street. It was enough to create panic in the family. “As I heard the howling I rushed to the roof and saw the mob vandalising vehicles on the roads. Soon they [Dera supporters] attacked the security forces. For almost an hour, they created mayhem. As they assembled outside my house, it sent a shiver down my spine. I was worried they would harm us,” she said. “What my family and I went through the past few days was a terrible experience. We were virtually locked inside our home.”